Monday, January 23, 2006
On Generational Change
Generations are fictions. Or so someone said once.

Marketers find them first. That's basically what Howe and Strauss, with their "Generations" framework and consulting business, do--they make loads of loot drawing lines around populations for companies that sell snowboards and spaghetti-strap tops and yellow plastic wristbands and stuff. So unlock the malls, because here come The Millennials.

Howe and Strauss surveyed 600 students at high schools in upper-middle-class Fairfax County, Virginia, to generate insights into young'ns that they then resell to multinationals. Their big finding? Young'ns prefer being called Millennials to "Generation Y".

Pssssh. Who wouldn't?

And who decided on these damn names anyway?

And hold on wait a minute, just what does a survey of seniors in Fairfax County--67% white, by the way--have to say about a generation of kids growing up in Richmond, California? Or Richmond, Virginia, for that matter? Can I vote for "not as much as you think"?

This weekend the NY Times ran an extensive piece on The Millennials, focusing primarily on their use of media (80% of you read blogs), their clique-ishness ("They are very bound to ethics and values. But in a funny sort of way, it prevents some of them from developing as individuals," says one concerned doctor), and whether or not companies will succeed in attracting them ("Downloading is the poor man's Tivo", says one broke Millennial).

Ho hum.

It's the same thing old folks (the ones now called "The Greatest Generation") used to say about their Spock-coddled Baby Boomers, minus the hysterical alarm.

It's too bad the alarm still hasn't stopped ringing about that old scapegoat, "Generation X". And by extension, the old straw-men--the ones blamed for conformity and greed in all the old manifestos--are now called "The Greatest". Amazing how a fat inheritance can change a perception.

According to Howe and Strauss, even the Millennials know the deal: "By a five-to-one margin, they agreed that the elderly G.I. Generation had a "mainly positive" reputation. By the two-to-one margin, they agreed that Generation X has a "mainly negative" reputation." Oh yeah? Well fuck you!

The thing to point out about all this quackery is that Howe and Strauss are, you guessed it, Baby Boomers. Everything is colored by their kaleidoscope eyes. Indeed, the dominant discourse in American life about generational change is still framed by Boomers.

Interestingly, a lot of Boomers themselves don't believe the hype anymore.

"The Aging of Aquarius" is a barbed-wire gem by Jamie Malanowski on Boomer navel-gazing. If Brokaw projects all his guilt on his parents, and Howe and Strauss project all their happy feelings onto the Millennials--who just happen to be the age of their children--well, American University professor Leonard Steinhorn only has to look in the mirror to declare all is good.

Before going there with Dr. Steinhorn, Malanowski addresses that uniquely Boomer gumption epitomized in Tom Brokaw, yes, he of the "Greatest Generation" fame:

Readers will recall that it was Tom Brokaw's great good luck as a journalist, as a reporter of news, to uncover that back in the 1930s and 1940s, a large mass of young Americans had to suffer, a) the trials and deprivations of the Great Depression, then b) fight a terrible war —a “world war” in the parlance of the time—against countries bent on global domination. Not only did Brokaw have the courage to bring to light this virtually hidden chapter of our history, but he or an associate had the marketing savvy to title the book The Greatest Generation, an irresistibly flattering phrase which sustained the book through many printings and multiple sequels.


This article is a must-read, so I really don't want to spoil Malanowski's killer close.

But just to say that if generations are created to scapegoat, there have to be generations to honor. The thing is, history doesn't always help. I found this, what, every single fucking day I was working on this damn book. For like 10+ years! Maybe I still got a chip on my shoulder, hell, a rock. Rather than grouse any more--which I am told I wont to do as a Gen X-er, trapped with a name he never made in a world he never made--I guess I'll just take a cue from Howe and Strauss and say buy my damn book already.

ADDENDUM 1/24/06: Scratch that last sentence. Buy this book instead: Letters From Young Activists. Now. What are you waiting for?

posted by Zentronix @ 6:11 PM   6 comments

6 Comments:

At 1/23/06, 8:04 PM, Blogger J T. Ramsay said...

This reminds me of Benedict Anderson's riff in Imagined Communities on the development of the tomb of the unknown soldier, the proliferation of that idea around the world and its subsequent currency.

The Brokaws of the world fell over themselves to canonize a generation that accepted entrenched, codified racism as fait accompli. How that goes unnoticed is beyond me; I hasten to add that certain nostalgias among black elites contribute to the myth too (this is a big take home message in Adolph Reed, Jr.'s work).

Of course, these sort of dialectic conflicts aren't always bad, and sometimes it's the marketing that works against itself, making clearer the delineation between haves and have nots, making it the stuff of revolutionary youth movements, too.

 
At 1/24/06, 8:19 AM, Blogger Zentronix said...

>>The Brokaws of the world fell over themselves to canonize a generation that accepted entrenched, codified racism as fait accompli.<<

Well, Steinhorn apparently gives credit to the Boomers for fixing the sins of the Greatest Generation, which is one of the things that make them "Greater".

There's also the idea that Boomers are somehow more spiritually attuned than Hip-Hop Gen folks, like they've got a direct line to God and we gotta call them first. Per Malanowski, take credit for the renewal of fundamentalism, too, then.

But what do I know anyway?

 
At 1/24/06, 2:41 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I, speaking as a... ugh... "Millenial" was fine being referred to as "Generation Y" or "Spawn of Aging Hippies." "Millenials" makes us sound like very peculiar flowers.

Beyond that, I think these old dudes don't have a clue what we're up to... or at least some of us. One of the funny things about generations is that the ones who aren't changing anything are always the same as their equivalents in previous generations

 
At 2/1/06, 5:59 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

When thinking about different generations of music, I think it's important to realize that times do change, as evidenced in Chang's book. Yesterday's generation had original passion for the music they created while much of today's music culture is based solely on making money and making women dance explicitly. This has also led to the evolution of muscial genres. We all know that the south has risen with its "lean with it" style. Every other part of the U.S. has had it's time, and they will surely have a second chance as time passes on.

 
At 2/1/06, 7:03 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't think these guys and can take a few high school students from some small town and sum up what's going on with "millenials" as a whole. What they found is what's going on in their world. The majority of those kids were white, which does not completely represent the newly labeled generation of millenials. The results of their findings would be more accurate if that completed surveys from multiple high schools in more urban areas all over the country. May be these guys should take a few pointers from Jeff Chang when it comes to giving information. Chang informed us about hip-hop through all ethnicities involved in creating the culture. He took information from multiple sources and peaced them together. Great Job on the book "Can't Stop, Won't Stop." It was very informative!!

 
At 2/1/06, 8:13 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would say it is ambigious to name a generation the "greatest", considering the fact that there are many more to come with the potential of achieving greater things. Furthermore, can't characterize a generation that has not yet reached its fullest potential. However, Jeff Chang did a good job putting information together enhancing different point of views, giving a non-bias point of view. Great book, "Cant Stop Wont Stop".

 

Post a Comment

 

Previous posts
Miggy to O's: That's Not What I Meant!
Benzino and Mays Ousted From The Source
Parliament Funkadelic 1969
Queens Reigns Supreme On The Small Screen
Voted, Didn't Die
Tribute to Martha Cooper
2006 Predictions
2005 :: The Year Crack Rap Broke (Yet Again)
The Last Thread Of 2005
Sampling Junkies & Producers Take Note: Copyright ...


select * from pages where handle = "BlogLinks" #content#

Archives
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
 

Email list

Add me to the Can't Stop Won't Stop email list, an irregular update of what's new in our world:

Submit