Tuesday, May 02, 2006
Immigrant Rights And Anti-Black Racism
A difficult, but necessary, critique by Andre Banks of the rhetoric of the immigrant rights movement, echoing comments made by Ronnie in yesterday's post:

"There is little question that the current immigration debate, though coded and contrived otherwise, is entirely about race. Yet, the framing made popular by immigrants and their advocates is so hostile to Black people and our American experience that it seems impossible for us to stake a claim with this movement. Today's immigrants will find that without Blacks, and a commitment to challenge racism beyond the reach of immigration policy alone, their movement will lose both its moral authority and the practical victory it hopes to achieve.

The language of today's movement directly evokes a painful history. Immigrants who laid claim in the past to this re-imagined American dream colluded with a system of racism that made the hope of health, safety and happiness an empty promise for Black people. Immigrants on the march today threaten to go the way of the Irish, the Italian and the Jewish: they may pay the price of the ticket for American citizenship by yielding to a racial hierarchy that leaves Blacks at the bottom.

Immigrants and their advocates have gained attention by evoking the narrative of hard-working immigrants making good in the land of opportunity - the American Dream redux - with its attendant contradictions and contrivances. With cries that 'immigrants built this country,' a favorite calling card, this burgeoning movement at once revoked the history of slaves and their descendants and obscured important truths about power, migration and social mobility in this country. For my great-grandmother, and generations of Black people in this country before and after her, this lie is worse than silence. It is a critical and strategic omission that adds Mexicans, Salvadorans and Guatemalans to the annals of American history while relegating Black people to its shadows.

The narrative of the immigrant as the symbol of hard work that leads to opportunity can mean nothing but alienation for Black people precisely because we know this myth is false. Without our labor - not immigrant labor, but slave labor - in the fields and on the march there would be no market brimming with wealth and economic opportunity, nor a tradition of civil and political rights readily available for appropriation and exploitation.

So, listening to the language of immigrant rights in 2006, a sensible Black person might respond with ambivalence. It is difficult to take the cause seriously, much less call it our own. Immigrant rights advocates have the potential to speak broadly, and Black people more than any other group might champion an extension of human rights denied to those on the margins. But instead we are displaced from this movement by coded messages that celebrate a history of anti-black racism. "


Find further commentary and resources on the immigrant rights actions here.

posted by Zentronix @ 6:16 PM   4 comments

4 Comments:

At 5/2/06, 6:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Agreed, harsh but absolutley necessary. These protests cannot be a single event, single issue ordeal, otherwise the message they send is that the low-wage jobs many immigrants and non-immigrants work are acceptable.

 
At 5/3/06, 12:38 AM, Blogger Alice B. said...

The author is obviously guilty of that outdated -formerly American- way of seeing the world: in black and white. When he says "immigrant" he obviously means "nouveau or future white". Where's the grey? What does this analysis make of immigrants of african descent?

Also, must "immigrants built this country" be interpreted as "only immigrants built this country"?

There are slaves somewhere up my chain of ancestry. I am also an immigrant. Must I choose sides? It seems a no brainer to me that I should empathize with both plights, especially since plantation slavery no longer exists.

Besides, where exactly is the conflict? For those who can't see the grey: it is both true that slaves built this country *and* that the descendants of those same slaves do not today want the jobs that undocumented immigrants take... at least not in NY.

 
At 5/3/06, 7:48 AM, Blogger Doles said...

I agree with Andre in that there is an unseen and untold underbelly of the immigrants rights movement. When hearing stories or seeing pictures of the many demonstrations across the country, you see the American flag being waved on high, held up by brown hands in an effort to say "Yes, me too. I'm American too. I'm GENUINELY American because I live that American(immigrant)dream." But at what cost do immigrants live out the dream? The immigrant rights movement, instead of being part of a radical moment jettisoning the notion of national identity, has been couched in a discourse resembling something like "we're more pacifiable than American black folks, so we won't complain about exploitation. We're better labor." I can't knock the hustle, I'm a first generation Korean. I had that green card. I'm guilty of model minority syndrome, no doubt. However, this reminds me of two past supposedly radical movements in recent American history that have had some nasty things swept under the rug uncritically. 1)the American labor movement in the 80s that saw blue collar whites beating up and killing random Asian people because of the "Asian Invasion" of the automobile industry. It was a nightmare for the labor movement in America, I think because it lost Black blue collar support because the virtual lynch mobs all across middle America harkened back to Reconstruction-era race and sex politics. Black UAW workers were going to feel good about bashing in a Toyota with an axe? Probably not(not to say all whites would but this is how the history has been written). 2)the anti-globalization mobilization in Seattle that saw the convergence of two seemingly opposing groups: a)the white unionists, who were mad at the multinats for going abroad and outsourcing and leaving them unemployed. b)the college kids who were there behalf of the Third World(so they thought), fighting against the awful labor practices of multinats in the post-colonial world. This became an unusual alliance because the college kids were like stop the exploitation whereas the unionists were like "please exploit us, we wanna get paid."

I note all of this to say one thing: who is the enemy here? Big-C "capital"? The government? The conservatives? Not singularly any of these. The immigration rights movement has thus far been highly nationalist, which to me is outmoded and quite dangerous. The immigrants rights folks are going to soon sound like Pat Buchanan. Why not play up the difference in a radical move? Why not put fear in the WASPy conservative politos by saying, we're culturally different and that's the way it is. Let us in because it's morally right. It's not all about labor, it's about CULTURE as well. Andre's comments are right on because this immigration rights movement has a political unconscious that evokes the "culture of poverty" from the Moynihan report and the Clinton-era welfare agenda. I've rambled, I'll field further questions upon request. Sorry.

 
At 5/6/06, 5:56 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Here's another view:

America was not "built" at all. People are still building America, and the project won't be finished any time soon.

 

Post a Comment

 

Previous posts
Funniest Headline Of The Day (...If You're Not A M...
A Day Without Us
Zirin on May 1: A day without all-stars?
Who Killed Biggie?
A Frustrated Golden State Fan's Guide To The Playoffs
Gangsta Gumbo And The Hip-Hop Nostalgia Shuffle
New Orleans: Vote!
Krups :: Grups of Color
More Evidence Media Consolidation Causes Stupidity...
Hip-Hop Is Dead, Part 35,784


select * from pages where handle = "BlogLinks" #content#

Archives
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
 

Email list

Add me to the Can't Stop Won't Stop email list, an irregular update of what's new in our world:

Submit