Thursday, February 07, 2008
2G2K Circus :: More Analysis On Latino/AsAm Vote But By Experts This Time
Today's SF Chron had good reporting and analysis on the Latino and Asian American votes. You can access the full article here.

Wanted to pull some excerpts. First, some more data, and Barack's 'spinion:

Clinton won a majority of Latino votes in several states with high proportions of Latino voters, including New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and - the biggest prize - California, where she beat Obama 2-1 among Latinos, according to an MSNBC exit poll. And she drew votes from about 75 percent of Asian American Democrats in California, who represent about 8 percent of the state's total Democratic vote, according the MSNBC exit poll.

But Obama did well with Latino voters in his home state of Illinois (JEFF NOTE: CNN's exit poll, shows he took 58% of 30-44...), as well as in Connecticut, and he took more than 40 percent of Latino votes in Arizona, the exit poll shows.

"We actually made enormous progress last night," Obama said at a news conference Wednesday in Chicago. "You take a look at a state like Arizona, where we got somewhere in the low 40s with the Latino vote, and it indicates what I suggested earlier after the Nevada contest, which is as Latino voters get to know me, we do better.

"And so it's just a matter of us getting more information to them, doing the kind of advertising that we had the resources to do leading up to Super Tuesday. When they receive that information, they realize that I'm somebody who's going to be battling for all people, including the Latino vote."


Here's David Ayon, from the Center for the Study of Los Angeles at Loyola Marymount on the upcoming race in Texas, pertinent also to Cali:

But Ayón doubts Obama will capture the Lone Star state's Latinos, given Clinton's advantage.

"It's a real hard sell. The only advantage he has in Texas is, he's got money and he's got time. But he's unknown," said Ayón. "The Clintons have really worked this ground. They're able to stage events, work those networks, get the machinery going. What Obama's doing everywhere is building an organization from scratch. And that's a lot harder to do in a large state."


On the question of time and on-the-ground organizers, I wanted to point out a comment posted below from an old colleague John Delloro, now a union organizer and activist (also check out the comment by Monxo & Libertad):

Because the key to Obama's campaign success is its ground operation that is based on a grassroots community organizing model (a la Marshall Ganz), any time the campaign treads the traditional top-down and tested electoral campaign approach the Obama campaign falters in that area. I don't believe the kind of structure that existed in S.Carolina and Iowa existed in AA/PI immigrant L.A. or Latina/o L.A. If SEIU in LA had switched for Obama earlier and hit the ground, that structure would most likely would have existed. the past L.A. Latina/Labor alliance electoral work has proven this to be true. Maria Elena Durazo got involved with the Obama campaign without the usual footsoldiers she has on hand to make things happen. I don't believe it is just a case of whether a particular community has reached a particular zeitgeist of generational insurgency but the presence or absence of grassroots organization in particular communities.


On the Asian Am vote, some thoughts from one of my mentors, Don Nakanishi, at the Asian American Studies Center, speaking to API emergence:

Clinton also has emphasized her commitment to Asian Americans, locking down several important Asian American politicians, said Don Nakanishi of UCLA's Asian American Studies Center. Last year, for example, Clinton landed support from Rep. Doris Matsui, D-Sacramento, who chairs Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders for Hillary.

"The vote doesn't surprise me at all," Nakanishi said, noting that Clinton has strong roots in the community. "But there was a very active core of young Asian Americans who are very supportive of Obama, trying to raise his visibility."

Obama, who grew up in Hawai'i and has Asian family members, has made his multi-ethnic roots part of the political campaign. Last week, his Chinese Canadian brother-in-law, Konrad Ng, addressed Asian American voters, telling them that their perspective is important to Obama.

Although small compared to the Latino vote, the Asian American vote is gaining clout. The Asian American Studies Center estimates that between the years 2000 and 2005, the number of Asian Americans eligible to vote in California increased from 2 million to 2.5 million, pushing the Asian American share of the proportion of the state's voters to 12 percent.

"They also developed this reputation of being the new source of financial contributions, so they are being courted by political campaigns," Nakanishi said.


BTW Don's point about Doris Matsui prompts me to realize that the glaring hole in my piece and most of the discourse in the MSM and the blogosphere is that no one has thought to talk about the possibility of a huge gender gap in California's Latino and Asian American electorates, in turnout and in choice. Anyone care to comment on this or point us in the direction of some commentary?

And finally, this from Rafael Sonenshein, an expert on race and politics in Los Angeles and California who has done pioneering studies on Tom Bradley's and other campaigns:

"People say Latinos won't vote for a black candidate. Well, sometimes they do and sometimes they don't. There are existing tensions, but the way to overcome those is through familiarity, through learning something about a candidate that helps you connect."

Labels: , , , ,


posted by Zentronix @ 10:27 AM   6 comments

6 Comments:

At 2/7/08, 5:20 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I'm raising a point that I think we often ignore, but which is important to think about: who are Latinos?

I think the assumption of most writers in the English language is that "Latinos" refers to a racial group when, in fact, most people who trace some ancestry to Latin America are people who include descendents of African slaves (or enslaved Africans), Asians, indigenous people of North and South America, and/or Western European (Spaniards, French, Germanic, Italian, etc.) So can we assume that "Black" people does not include "Latinos?" Or does "Black" only mean people of African descent who don't identify with any (predominantly) Spanish or Portuguese-speaking country?

 
At 2/7/08, 6:23 PM, Blogger Zentronix said...

A supremely fair and on point question.

I think the assumption of the commentators in the SF Chron article is that they're speaking about Chicanos/Mexicanos, not Salvadorans or Guatemalans. Monxo is talking below about Puerto Ricans and Dominicans in New York and Jersey. If we're in Miami, it's complicated again by Cubanos. And I know I'm simplifying ridiculously here!

I do regret the shorthand I've been using. I'm ready to talk all day about the diversity of Latinos (Hispanics to respect all you East Coasters), not to mention Asian Americans, Pilipinos, and Pacific Islanders. (And believe me, I've done it.)

But I think even if you factor in ethnicity and panethnicity, my theory can still hold up.

 
At 2/7/08, 9:32 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

jeff,

actually, asian americans are not overly democratic in california. according to statistics, the breakdown is 30% republican,30% independent, and 40% democrats. A main reason is the Asian community is not monolithic voting bloc.

 
At 2/8/08, 7:27 AM, Blogger Zentronix said...

All the studies I've seen since the 2000 elections have APIs going Dem, by anywhere from a majority, to 2-1. Here's but one summary. I've got more.:

http://www.asianam.org/APA_vote_in_presidential_election.htm

What's your source?

 
At 2/9/08, 6:50 AM, Blogger Unknown said...

speaking as an Afro Latino, i can say this. Several Latinos (i am lumping Chicanos, Puerto ricans, dominicans, Chileans, and other decendants from Latin America here) from the older generation don't have any particular love for African Americans. so voting for Obama is not on their agenda.

maybe you guys are overanalyzing that situation. it could be as simple as the idea that a good number of those groups are not voting for Obama because he is black.

 
At 2/11/08, 2:02 PM, Blogger Zentronix said...

I realize this won't satisfy any of yall who like your answers simple (even though I thought mine pretty much was). But here's a frickin' multiple-regression analysis! Rrrrrrraaaah!!!

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/2/9/13227/22519/239/453361

 

Post a Comment

 

Previous posts
2G2K Circus: Latinos And Asian Americans, Part 2
2G2K Circus :: Anti-Black Racism and My Alleged Cy...
2G2K Circus :: Why Latinos And Asian Americans Wen...
2G2K Circus :: Run On Ballots In College Precincts...
2G2K :: It's Super Fat Tuesday
2G2K :: Diddy Answers Davey D
2G2K :: Will.I.Am And A Cast of SuperHotties Endor...
2G2K Circus :: Tom Hayden Endorses Obama
2G2K Circus :: Underdog Love Is Back
2G2K Circus :: What We Learned


select * from pages where handle = "BlogLinks" #content#

Archives
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
 

Email list

Add me to the Can't Stop Won't Stop email list, an irregular update of what's new in our world:

Submit