Monday, November 26, 2007
Not All Info Wants To Be Free Anymore
Thanks to Dave Goetsch, who is currently walking the WB picket line, here's a link to
Jaron Lanier's change of heart.

To the media monopolists and privatizers-run-amuck, not all information wants to be free. Not anymore... ::


Internet idealists like me have long had an easy answer for creative types — like the striking screenwriters in Hollywood — who feel threatened by the unremunerative nature of our new Eden: stop whining and figure out how to join the party!

That’s the line I spouted when I was part of the birthing celebrations for the Web. I even wrote a manifesto titled “Piracy Is Your Friend.” But I was wrong. We were all wrong.

Like so many in Silicon Valley in the 1990s, I thought the Web would increase business opportunities for writers and artists. Instead they have decreased. Most of the big names in the industry — Google, Facebook, MySpace and increasingly even Apple and Microsoft — are now in the business of assembling content from unpaid Internet users to sell advertising to other Internet users.

There’s an almost religious belief in the Valley that charging for content is bad. The only business plan in sight is ever more advertising. One might ask what will be left to advertise once everyone is aggregated.

How long must creative people wait for the Web’s new wealth to find a path to their doors? A decade is a long enough time that idealism and hope are no longer enough. If there’s one practice technologists ought to embrace, it is the evaluation of empirical results.

To help writers and artists earn a living online, software engineers and Internet evangelists need to exercise the power they hold as designers. Information is free on the Internet because we created the system to be that way.

We could design information systems so that people can pay for content — so that anyone has the chance of becoming a widely read author and yet can also be paid. Information could be universally accessible but on an affordable instead of an absolutely free basis.

People happily pay for content in certain Internet ecosystems, provided the ecosystems are delightful. People love paying for virtual art, clothing and other items in virtual worlds like Second Life, for instance. Something similar is going on for music within the ecosystem of the iPod.

Affordable turns out to be much harder than free when it comes to information technology, but we are smart enough to figure it out. We owe it to ourselves and to our creative friends to acknowledge the negative results of our old idealism. We need to grow up.


posted by Zentronix @ 1:08 PM   4 comments links to this post

4 Comments:

At 11/28/07, 7:49 PM, Blogger Freddie Sirmans said...

Just browsing the internet. You have a very, very interesting blog.

 
At 11/29/07, 11:25 AM, Anonymous zane said...

Typically I agree with Jaron, and I don't disagree with him entirely in this case. However he's incorrect in saying: "People love paying for virtual art, clothing and other items in virtual worlds like Second Life, for instance." Companies just aren't making money in Second Life.

I think people are interested in buying something virtual during early stages, then quickly regret it later when they realize that something isn't real. That's very different from buying music in iTunes, which you then own and can listen to whenever/however you want...

 
At 11/29/07, 12:55 PM, Blogger Zentronix said...

That's a really interesting take. I wonder if it harms the larger argument--which is that there needs to be a line drawn when it comes to content creation.

I want to hasten to add that I'm not sure I know yet where the line always gets drawn--the WGA does in their case, and I'm down with them--but I'm certainly tired of seeing rates going down, profits being snatched away from creators, and artists rights being trampled.

 
At 11/30/07, 5:32 PM, Anonymous zane said...

Jeff, I agree with you whole heartedly. I think there's a difference though between the 'virtual' content of Second Life and genuine, creative content (like that created by writers such as yourself, or those in the guild). People want to pay for the latter, but not the former. That's why I wish Jaron had left that reference out. But largely I agree with the sentiment. And I definitely agree with you about artists' rights, and content creators getting paid.

 

Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link

 

Previous posts
BCS (Brah, Cannot Stop) 'Bows!
Shake That Turkey
Death From Above '07
Ode To Indonesia :: Jogja Journey
Fans Of "The Wire" :: Hands Up!
Me In The Nation:: M.I.A. :: News From Nowhere
NY Times Paper Cuts : Living with Music :: Listen ...
Me and Mother Jones :: Hip-Hop Politics In A New E...
Foreign Policy :: It's A Hip-Hop World
Marc Bamuthi Joseph, Kool Herc & Clyde Stubblefiel...


select * from pages where handle = "BlogLinks" #content#

Archives
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
 

Email list

Add me to the Can't Stop Won't Stop email list, an irregular update of what's new in our world:

Submit