Thursday, August 25, 2005
LA's War On Graffiti Continues
From the good folks at 149th comes this story:

Los Angeles is often called the mural capital of the world — and no place is this truer than on the streets of Boyle Heights, where hundreds of walls at pharmacies, general stores, guitar shops and even churches have been transformed into urban artwork.

The murals depict Mexican American history, advertise businesses and take the form of abstract art at the hands of graffiti taggers.

But now some residents complain that they cannot tell some of the murals from the illegal graffiti that have long plagued the area. So the city is cracking down.

Using a little-known ordinance that allows the city to regulate murals that abut public property — including sidewalks — officials have notified some property owners that they must either modify or remove their murals.

This renewed war on graf began with the arrival of Police Chief William Bratton, and now appears to be making headlines again as new Mayor Villaraigosa swings right after being elected by a liberal-progressive, brown-black coalition.

posted by Zentronix @ 9:32 AM   2 comments links to this post


At 8/26/05, 4:03 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

My question is why can't a property own who has a permit-less mural... simply whitewash it and paint a new mural? Why do they have to use this "non-profit" mural organization??

That's bullshit. Either a mural has a permit or it doesn't. No permit... no mural. That makes sense. But to require someone to use this 3rd party for a mural on PRIVATE PROPERTY is ridiculous.


At 8/31/05, 11:40 PM, Blogger leftside said...

I work for the City of LA (Planning Dept.) and this makes no sense for anyone - the owners who wanted it, the artists, the City's beauty and economy. The problem is basicly one of an out of touch bureacracy that doesn't care to differentiate beween tags, art murals and normal wall signs.

Though, the planner in me sees some reasons for regulation (all other advertising is regulated for size, workmanship, harm to building, etc). But I bet the real reason are the influential homeowners complaining to their officials.

The problem is with the way they chose to deal with it is typically ass-backwards. They have their (usually legal) reasons that protect the City once it "blesses" a mural. But the need to repaint is totally stupid, unless there is a problem. But who defines that? I'd prefer a peer-based or neighborhood arts group. These murals are some of the most positive things you see on some East Los streets.



Post a Comment

Links to this post:

Create a Link


Previous posts
Terry Gross Fresh Air Hip-Hop Week
Got Hurban? Si!
To MFA Or Not To MFA?
Sizzla Signs To Dame Dash Label
A Convo On Hip-Hop Writing
Boogie Down
Mos Def Calls Out Suge Knight In LA
Jim Farber on The Source
Judith Miller: No Journalistic Martyr
I Just Want It To Be Over

select * from pages where handle = "BlogLinks" #content#

June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009

Email list

Add me to the Can't Stop Won't Stop email list, an irregular update of what's new in our world: