Friday, September 02, 2005
New Orleans, the Bushes, and the Politics of Abandonment
In New Orleans, the end of George W. Bush's term begins. It exposes his morally empty politics of abandonment.

All week, his statements to the press have been terse and out-of-touch, a mix of sunny optimism and defensive posturing, spiked with promises he doesn't even seem convinced he can deliver. Today he will give a press conference at New Orleans airport, miles away from the Superdome, now Ground Zero of the Flood of 2005.

It will undoubtedly be reminiscent of another Bush speech in the wake of a disaster--his father's talk in 1992, three days after the start of the Los Angeles riots. At the Superdome, people have been chanting at TV cameras --"we are dying"--and this Bush also cannot escape a sense that he is there with much too little, far too late.

His father's speech on May 1, 1992 focused on violence, a way of diverting the focus of what was to be the last real debate about urban poverty this nation has had. So instead of rebuilding the city and reversing poverty, the focus of the 1992 urban aid bill shifted to short-term disaster relief, a continuation of years of abandoning the poor to serve the rich.

By now, it's clear that New Orleans was long abandoned before Hurricane Katrina and the levee breaks forced the city's actual abandonment. For years, scientists have not only warned of potential levee breaks that could inundate this city, but provided potential solutions. It ranked as one of FEMA's top 3 most likely catastrophic disasters to occur.

Yet a city that is 2/3rds black and a quarter impoverished never merited the little money that had been asked for to study and shore up sinking levees. Instead, the money went to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, wars that uprooted and then abandoned the poor to once again serve the rich.

As Paul Krugman writes:

I don't think this is a simple task of incompetence. The reason the military wasn't rushed in to help along the Gulf Coast is, I believe, the same reason nothing was done to stop looting after the fall of Baghdad. Flood control was neglected for the same reason our troops in Iraq didn't get adequate armor.

At a fundamental level, I'd argue, our current leaders just aren't serious about some of the essential functions of government. They like waging war, but they don't like providing security, rescuing those in need or spending on protective measures. And they never ever ask for shared sacrifice...

So America, once famous for its can-do attitude, now has a can't-do governemnt that makes excuses instead of doing its job. And while it makes those excuses, Americans are dying.


New Orleans, and other places in Mississippi and Alabama today, are not too different from Los Angeles in 1992, the Bronx in 1977, or Baghdad and Kabul in 2005.

They provide parallel images now--a complicated visual jigsaw of mass tragedy, starvation, disease, thug warfare, and at the same time, a spontaneous outpouring of collective empathy, sacrifice, and support.

This is death from above.

posted by Zentronix @ 10:35 AM   11 comments

11 Comments:

At 9/2/05, 3:40 PM, Blogger Cal Ulmann said...

I don't think Bush is to blame alone. I'm sure some of the Hundr3eds of Billions in the transportation bill could have been diverted to be diverted but both parties of Congress screwed up.

 
At 9/2/05, 8:46 PM, Blogger Unknown said...

i think CHang is blaming all levels of gov't for this... Bush, COngress, city gov't... etc..

 
At 9/3/05, 2:09 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

kanye west made some pointed remarks today during the NBC relief concert. this blog links to a video of kanye's sure-to-be-controversial remarks:
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/9177352/page/2/

his comments weren't polished like the emtionally devoid script other celeb's read off the prompters, but the man makes some damn good points. some will likely see it as a stunt to sell more copies of late registration, but i agree with ye.

while it'd be unfair to solely blame bush for katrina, he was tragically slow to react (just like 9/11). his sluggishness has sentenced a lot of folks to prolonged suffering and worse. it took him 3-5 days to finally get out there... and i know he wasn't busy because he was on frickin' vacation!

then again, can't say that i am suprised. what do you expect from a C average student?

but enough with bush-trashing ... it's all about relief for now. we can sort out the politics after our people are out of danger.

 
At 9/3/05, 2:11 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

p.s. anyone knows the best way to donate, email me at mike27112@gmail.com .

mike li

 
At 9/3/05, 1:45 PM, Blogger ronnie brown said...

Bush was the "emperor with no clothes" long before he assumed the Presidency. His "cowboy charisma" is nothing more than a public relations cover for his general incompetence...surrounded by yes men within and cheerleading corporate news media from without; a freshly served hot mess.

Alfred E. Newmann must be proud.

 
At 9/4/05, 3:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

I disagree with bush's policies, but he probably cares about what happened to the people in the region.

I disagree with the politics but he also probably has thousands of threats his own way every day.

Of course people care about what happened. You could argue that Bush is being an oportunist about the photo ops, but you could just as simply argue that all of the negative comments about his presidency are every bit as opportunist on the part of his rival's.

Even if you disagree with a president, it's odd to see the same sort of negative campaigning that clinton went through going the same way, and from some of the people that defended Clinton. Of course, people care about what happened, they probably didn't see it coming.

 
At 9/4/05, 3:35 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Is bush incompetent or did he have some really onbnoxious speech writers early on? Did you go to school with them?

 
At 9/4/05, 3:36 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

One thing you can say, for once some republicans might resist chicken and girl jokes during wartime.

Looks like it wasn't vegas, baby, after all.

But the tragedy is senseless, so that is other than to take away from that.

 
At 9/4/05, 8:34 PM, Blogger ronnie brown said...

Bush "probably" cares what happened?????????

sigh!

 
At 9/6/05, 9:49 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Many people are waiting for Bush to stumble. Some are saying this is the turning point. Of what? His impeachment? He already got his 2nd term people! It's a little LATE for turning points.

If we assumed people vote logically and rationally, with their best interests in mind... maybe accountability would be the appropriate angle on this. But, um, last time I checked, Bush was elected to invade countries and keep government "small" ;)

When a person commits suicide, it doesn't make sense to anyone. Yet it makes perfect sense to the person who kills himself. To me, this is the appropriate metaphor for contemporary American politics.

It's a suicide.

_eric

ps. peace to the Gravediggaz

 
At 9/6/05, 8:37 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Great column, Jeff.

Not to say I endorse it, but I'm surprised that people aren't rioting. When I heard there was looting, the first thing that I thought of was the LA riots. This was a very basic failure of government -- before, during, and after the tragedy, and at almost all levels. I can't comprehend how, in this age of supposedly heightened homeland security, something like this could happen. I'm not blaming just Bush, but there seems to be a passive aggressive racism and classism that defines his presidency. Check out this editorial in NYT today:

http://www.nytimes.com/2005/09/06/opinion/06kristof.html

I assumed things had gotten worse in the past few years, but I never imagined that they were this bad. And to bring it around to what Jeff was saying, all three tragedies (the NYC blackout, the LA riots, and NO flood) seem to be during periods of economic abandonment based on race and class. Just like the blackout and the riots, the tragedy NO didn't arise from a vacuum.

And this isn't at all like the personal attacks hurled Clinton's way. Maybe the tone of it is, but Clinton haters focused on conspiracies involving land deals in Arkansas, supposed homicides that Clinton orchestrated, anti-gun policies that he never implemented or even suggested, extramarital affairs that he may or may not have had. If Clinton would've led us into a war based on false pretences or if he would've bungled a disaster on this scale, he would've been impeached or worse.

 

Post a Comment

 

Previous posts
A Prayer For New Orleans
DMC and LL Cool J on Fresh Air Tomorrow
Hawai'i Dominates Little League, Brah!
Hip-Hop Week on NPR's Fresh Air
End of Summer Jammies
LA's War On Graffiti Continues
Terry Gross Fresh Air Hip-Hop Week
Got Hurban? Si!
To MFA Or Not To MFA?
Sizzla Signs To Dame Dash Label


select * from pages where handle = "BlogLinks" #content#

Archives
June 2002
July 2002
August 2002
September 2002
October 2002
November 2002
December 2002
January 2003
February 2003
March 2003
April 2003
May 2003
June 2003
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
December 2008
January 2009
February 2009
 

Email list

Add me to the Can't Stop Won't Stop email list, an irregular update of what's new in our world:

Submit